Gender Board Says No

After a little more than two weeks of deliberation the WA Gender Board has decided to reject my application for a Gender Recognition Certificate on the basis of section 15 (3) The so called “Forced Divorce” clause.

All aspects of my application were covered in the summation document, which includes the board’s  assessment of my documentation and a full review of their assessment  relating to counselling, social integration, and medical treatment for the purposes of transition. 

I tried hard, and raised what I believed were valid and strong legal challenges to section 15(3)  and to be fair to the Board, they clearly did a great deal of work to assess my challenges thoroughly in the context of the relevant act.

With regards to my challenge on section 109 (the inconsistency between State vs Federal law) I accept that their decision is correct and cannot be tested further. This was a long shot anyway, and relied on proving a direct inconsistency between a right granted by Federal Law  and removed by the State Act.

On the other challenge relating to section 117 (interstate discrimination) I remain unconvinced that their interpretation of this section  is consistent with the intention of the authors of that section of the constitution. It is however apparent from reading lots of case history on section 117 that there has yet to be a really definitive reading of this law.

If I am completely honest after a weekend of feeling closer to “giving up on everything”  than ever before, I am not sure I have the stomach for a further fight. Section 15 (3) Is wrong on every level. It will eventually be repealed, it has to be ! The federal Government has issued a very clear message to State Law makers on this issue. However for the foreseeable future it is also the Law. 

It was on the news today that Queensland has removed their version of 15 (3) So, my plan is to  see if I can learn a timeframe for the repeal of the offending law here in WA. If it is not close, I will lodge an appeal, even if this only serves to keep the pressure on the State Attorney General and drive some progress towards obliterating this discriminating statute, and sending it to the history books where it belongs.

 

 

 

3 responses to “Gender Board Says No”

  1. Kat avatar
    Kat

    Big hugs. What a crappy law.

  2. Basho47 avatar
    Basho47

    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win – Ghandi

    Hang in there lovely lady.

  3. Richard Giroud avatar
    Richard Giroud

    You are so much more and well beyond any such dated litigious “measure” and should not be discouraged just because the world is taking a bit to catch up 🙂 They will get there in part with your help.

    “Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any [Forced Divorce clause] on the planet” (with apologies to Mark Twain, who surely would not mind).

Leave a Reply

Discover more from WASP News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading